Posted By Jasmine (Vero Beach, Fl) on 08/26/2016
Hello all, I am thankful for this site and pray for unending blessings to all who contribute to it, and to those who created it. I have resolved many ailments here for me and my dog in the past.
I have mixed feelings about some parts of Dr Hamer's German New Medicine model, as to how it relates(or conflicts, rather) to biochemistry. Specifically -how Dr Hamer says that eating sugar does not cause cancer. How can this be correct? Isn't it proven that sugar feeds cancer? I'm only nit-picking at a very small specific part of Dr Hamer's model - or else we'd get way off topic since his model is comprehensive.
Now I know that our beloved Ted needs his rest and I wouldn't think of bothering him with this, but does anyone know of any research that proves Dr Hamer wrong in this specific example?
I do not have cancer, but for those that do, I would like to know if there is research out there regarding how sugar affects cancer. It seems very important to the recovery of the person, according to what our Ted has said in past posts.
Be the first to answer this question
Back to Cancer Q&A
