Candida Diet Protocol and Disseminated Psychiatric Candida

Posted By Ursie (Nc) on 10/22/2015

I have been using Bill Thompson's suggestions for a week now with wonderful success. I am totally amazed. My problem has been manifesting in a very deep cutaneous way over most of my body. After one week, I have actual healing going on. The lesions are not merely hardening up.

The reason I am writing is that today I had an appointment with a new dermatologist. This is the third one. For some reason, I once again, expected to have some sort of rapport and work on a solution. Minimally, I expected the doctor to take to me about the things I am doing at Bill's suggestion.... and the fact that it is working. She totally ignored the treatment plan I made based on Bill Thompson's book as she held it in her hands.

Her treatment plan for me is to relax, eat healthy and work with my psychiatrist for the next 3 months. Then she will see me again to see if I am improving. So my problem is psychiatric. I have done this to myself. Unbelievable.

I did not specifically ask her about any of Bills suggestions. But when I asked about my skin, she totally evaded my questions.... "lets not focus on that". She did not want to use psychiatric terms so she avoided medical terms altogether.

Is this code for something? Does she really not want to be my doctor? Or does she believe what she is saying? Did she hear ANYTHING I said?

So now I am going back to my general practitioner to tell her I am done with dermatologists. I am doing Bill's treatment and she is welcome to monitor my progress if she believes it is necessary. If she does not want to monitor my progress then I will instead monitor my self and ask her to order tests that I think I need when I think I need them.

Is this the way it has to be?

REPLY         

Replied by Timh (KY) on 10/25/2015

U: Thanx for verbalizing your experience as it is important to understand the disparagement between dr's and patients. Sadly, one could also draw a likely parallel with politicians that promise voters everything under the sun and once elected, are far out-of-reach or touch with constituents and many times break those promises

Back to your situation, I had somewhat of the same experience w/ a neurologist when I brought a photocopy of one of Dr Titlebaum's candida books cover which very much upset the doc.

This is how I understand the fundamentals of this problem. MD's are very much beholden to big pharma representatives that aggressively push new & patented meds for prescriptions. Dr's are carefully evaluated concerning their "performance" with meds & prescriptions, and are rewarded or punished according to that performance score. This may be particularly true for young MD's w/ tons of student loan dept, as well as living expenses & depts. In time, as MD's become more financially independent, they have more freedom to not bow to the pressure of big pharma and are more open to patient centered and natural treatments like you displayed. The Dr in mind will not prosper from Bill's anti-candida book, so it is therefore disregarded.

As for psychiatric, there is also a big-pharma link as mental medications are big profits for many drug corps. Then there is that superiority complex status as we the common public are to simply do as we're told. And it gets even nastier. If you are a conservative or a christian, and you own a firearm, well, the liberal agenda is anti-conservative & anti-right-to-bear-arms. If you are diagnosed with a mental disorder, your rights to self-protection are diminished.

Over time I have tried to abbreviate my dr/patient relation to myself being of easy & happy demeanor, few of words, and as factual as possible. And in difficult situations, a printed letter of any very important or sensitive info would be superior to an unrehearsed and sloppy verbal performance (which would tend to mental confusion or psychiatric cause).

I used this printed format some-time-back to cancel my relation to the md that requested mental health counseling, despite my B.A degree in Psychology & Religion, and absence of bad behavior toward anyone at the medical clinic, or any criminal history, or inability to govern myself physically or financially. What the basis of that diagnosis was I am unaware.

Yes, be very careful with the psychiatric "clause" as it can also hamper in advancing your social or career status. When filling out a job application and ask "have you ever been diagnosed with a mental illness or psychiatric disorder?" I think it much to your advantage to answer "no" to that question.

REPLY         

Back to Candida - Bill Thompson Q&A