5 star (21) | 88% | |
3 star (1) | 4% | |
1 star (2) | 8% |
Cindy (Houston, Texas) on 04/18/2007:
Eric (Manvel, Texas) on 03/29/2007:
The aftermath of home use of bloodroot could be extensive surgery, plastic surgery repair and treatment for metastatic cancer. Physicians would prefer not to pursue these costly options, but to take care of the problem right away with simple procedures so that patients do not suffer unnecessarily. Please reconsider your endorsement of bloodroot products, as they are dangerous and ineffective.
Wally (Sonoma, CA) on 03/07/2007:
Ally (Montreal, Canada) on 02/25/2007:
The problem with bloodroot is that no research was done on it. I think you should check this out, it might make you change your mind about using this "miraculous cure": http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/eschar.html
Shirl (Lakewood, CO) on 02/19/2007:
Francis (Detroit, MI) on 02/18/2007:
David (Lake City, FL) on 01/13/2007:
Penny (Oregon) on 12/16/2006:
Mike (USA) on 12/05/2006:
Tom (USA) on 11/29/2006:
It is sad that the FDA has become as big a problem as the problems it was designed to stop. There is no doubt 99% of the people that work for the FDA have good intentions, unfortunately the system is broken and many of them are in denial that it is. It is their job we are talking about.
It is my belief that they have gone too far in stopping companies that sell bloodroot from allowing unsolicited testimonials from being posted on the web because it might give people the idea that this stuff actually works...
It works.. I know.. I am a very experienced and satisfied user and it it frustrates me to no end to think they are denying "we the people" of the right to that information. If you are interested in seeing pictures of my bloodroot treatment (warning kind of gross and graphic) go to http://public.fotki.com/Anivoc/xxterra/
5 star (21) | 88% | |
3 star (1) | 4% | |
1 star (2) | 8% |
Cindy (Houston, Texas) on 04/18/2007:
Eric (Manvel, Texas) on 03/29/2007:
The aftermath of home use of bloodroot could be extensive surgery, plastic surgery repair and treatment for metastatic cancer. Physicians would prefer not to pursue these costly options, but to take care of the problem right away with simple procedures so that patients do not suffer unnecessarily. Please reconsider your endorsement of bloodroot products, as they are dangerous and ineffective.
Wally (Sonoma, CA) on 03/07/2007:
Ally (Montreal, Canada) on 02/25/2007:
The problem with bloodroot is that no research was done on it. I think you should check this out, it might make you change your mind about using this "miraculous cure": http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/eschar.html
Shirl (Lakewood, CO) on 02/19/2007:
Francis (Detroit, MI) on 02/18/2007:
David (Lake City, FL) on 01/13/2007:
Penny (Oregon) on 12/16/2006:
Mike (USA) on 12/05/2006:
Tom (USA) on 11/29/2006:
It is sad that the FDA has become as big a problem as the problems it was designed to stop. There is no doubt 99% of the people that work for the FDA have good intentions, unfortunately the system is broken and many of them are in denial that it is. It is their job we are talking about.
It is my belief that they have gone too far in stopping companies that sell bloodroot from allowing unsolicited testimonials from being posted on the web because it might give people the idea that this stuff actually works...
It works.. I know.. I am a very experienced and satisfied user and it it frustrates me to no end to think they are denying "we the people" of the right to that information. If you are interested in seeing pictures of my bloodroot treatment (warning kind of gross and graphic) go to http://public.fotki.com/Anivoc/xxterra/
Cindy (Houston, Texas) on 04/18/2007:
Eric (Manvel, Texas) on 03/29/2007:
The aftermath of home use of bloodroot could be extensive surgery, plastic surgery repair and treatment for metastatic cancer. Physicians would prefer not to pursue these costly options, but to take care of the problem right away with simple procedures so that patients do not suffer unnecessarily. Please reconsider your endorsement of bloodroot products, as they are dangerous and ineffective.
Wally (Sonoma, CA) on 03/07/2007:
Ally (Montreal, Canada) on 02/25/2007:
The problem with bloodroot is that no research was done on it. I think you should check this out, it might make you change your mind about using this "miraculous cure": http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/eschar.html
Shirl (Lakewood, CO) on 02/19/2007:
Francis (Detroit, MI) on 02/18/2007:
David (Lake City, FL) on 01/13/2007:
Penny (Oregon) on 12/16/2006:
Mike (USA) on 12/05/2006:
Tom (USA) on 11/29/2006:
It is sad that the FDA has become as big a problem as the problems it was designed to stop. There is no doubt 99% of the people that work for the FDA have good intentions, unfortunately the system is broken and many of them are in denial that it is. It is their job we are talking about.
It is my belief that they have gone too far in stopping companies that sell bloodroot from allowing unsolicited testimonials from being posted on the web because it might give people the idea that this stuff actually works...
It works.. I know.. I am a very experienced and satisfied user and it it frustrates me to no end to think they are denying "we the people" of the right to that information. If you are interested in seeing pictures of my bloodroot treatment (warning kind of gross and graphic) go to http://public.fotki.com/Anivoc/xxterra/